Friday, November 4, 2011

Sonnet 130

Klara Sulce

Mr. Perez

English AP

3 November 2011

In Sonnet 130, William Shakespeare utilizes literary devices to develop themes in his poems. He relates the speaker’s lover to a variety of other beauties---none of which work in the mistress's favor. During the Elizabethan era, poets accepted Petrarch’s technique for writing love poems. He makes highly overemphasized comparisons between nature and the poets’ paramour that when literally translated, sound absolutely preposterous. In Sonnet 130 William Shakespeare’s use of understatement parallels the common poets’ use of exaggeration with regards to their perception of women. As a result, the poem is uplifted and brings forth the ideas that women encompass flaws and that beauty should not be defined through comparisons to nature.

            In the first quatrain, Shakespeare states that her eyes are “nothing like the sun,” her lips are less red than coral; compared to white snow, her breasts are dun-colored, and her hairs are like black wires on her head. It is through being brutally honest that he teases the traditional metaphors, and demonstrates a speaker who somewhat bewildered, decides to tell the truth about women and their imperfections. He questions the conventions of love poetry common to his day by intimating that, “Your mistress’ eyes are like the sun?” For the speaker, this idea is bizarre. For “my mistress’ eyes aren’t at all like the sun.”

            In the couplet the speaker goes on to declare that, “by heav’n,” he finds the love he exhibits for his mistress as ultra rare and valuable. The speaker’s full intent is discovered in the last few lines of the sonnet. He demands that love does not require conceits in order to be genuine; and women do not need to look like goddesses in order to be beautiful.

Wednesday, November 2, 2011

Aesthetics in Sonnet 31

Understanding the art of a poem is not an easy task to accomplish, for people often refer to things as either “ugly” or “beautiful” without attempting to determine the meaning behind the object or work of art.  We indicate that something is beautiful because it holds value to us and embodies a definite purpose.  For example, lyrics are striking or significant because they remind us of an individual or moment in our lives.  This principle has been come to know as aesthetics, the branch of philosophy dealing with such notions as the beautiful, the ugly, the sublime, the comic, etc. Because artistic value is compassionately personal, it must be felt as ones own. Sonnet 31 by Sir Philip Sydney portrays beauty through its powerful poetic conceit and its ability to reflect on love.

            In Sonnet 31, Sir Philip Sidney is infatuated with Stella, the star he seems to be seeking, but yet she is far out of reach. He is hurt incontrovertibly because she rejects him.  He asks the moon rhetorical questions and confides in him about his love life with Stella. He then goes on to propose that all women must be the same and their existence on Earth or in the heavens is irrelevant.  He resembles the idea that once a man is mistreated by a woman they love, they lose hope for all the others that might potentially be different.  To go as far as question whether even in the heavenly realm faithful love is regarded as foolishness proves how ungrateful he believes Stella is by contemptuously rejecting him.

            While he speaks to the moon he remarks that both of them have now become fellow sufferers of love. It is fascinating that Sidney makes the moon into a proper noun by capitalizing it, almost giving it human qualities in doing so.  This apostrophic take on the poem shows how love can have irrational effects on people, but still holds exquisiteness behind it. The moon is beautiful because it helps morose romantics think, meditate, and dream while also creating a passionate atmosphere. Astrophel’s eyes meet with the moons at night in hope of receiving some sympathy from someone who sees all that goes on in the world and looks down at all the lovers.

Sydney’s influential vanity concerning love and his personal experience with it is the prime example of beautiful poetry. Love is a powerful emotion that conquers everyone in the world at one point in his or her life. Rejection is not pleasant, but when the person you love does not reciprocate your love, you have to have the pride to accept this fact. By confessing to the moon his dilemma, the speaker hoped to obtain compassion of some sort. As noted in Sonnet 31, love is a natural and extraordinary passion; humans are wired to fall in and out of love.  




Wednesday, October 26, 2011

Passion and responsibility go hand in hand.


Klara Sulce
Mr. Perez
English AP
27 October 2011
A frequently conveyed theme in literature is the classic war between passion and responsibility. William Faulkner’s novel As I Lay Dying displays forth this powerful clash between what one wants to do and what one needs to do. Most of the characters in this novel all face the challenge of deciding what is right to do and what they hope to accomplish. The most selfish person in As I Lay Dying is undeniably Addie and Anse’s daughter Dewey due to her unsympathetic attitude concerning her mother’s death and the fetus inside of her. Her actions show the predominance that one’s self-seeking passions hold against their obligations as a diligent person.
            Upon the death of her unfortunate mother, Dewey did not mourn as is expected to when one faces a dramatic loss such as this.  One of her goals in the novel should have been to abide her mother’s dying wish of being buried in Jefferson, however she becomes engrossed in her egocentric ways to accomplish this task. Although Dewey was going through a lot during her mothers’ illness being that a local farmhand left her pregnant, the reader is left feeling unsympathetic towards her. She portrays an immature and rash soon to be mother in distress and the struggles they face in modern day life. A moral duty of hers is to care for her youngest brother, Vardaman, be a mother figure to him, and to perhaps obtain some knowledge of how to take care of her own child.  However, she foolishly lets her own problems or rather; mistakes sojourn her from carrying out her responsibilities as the only woman left in charge of the Bundren residence.
            As a woman back in the 1930’s, Dewey should have taken over her mothers’ role in the family being that their family consists of five men.  Women are considered the caretakers of their families and have duties to live by such as cooking, cleaning, etc.  Dewey however, was not ready for this responsibility.  Conversely, she hopes to get rid of the fetus growing inside of her as soon as possible and demonstrates how uncivilized humanity becomes in order to fulfill their selfish needs. She is misled into exchanging sexual services at the local pharmacy in an effort to purchase abortion drugs. If Dewey had pursued help from one of her older brothers concerning her pregnancy; her outcome would have been extremely different. Ultimately, she seems to make one mistake after the other and displays the idea that once one stops being responsible, everything does downhill and leads to their decline.
            Not only did Dewey fail her responsibilities as a daughter, but she also was unsuccessful at being a potentially nurturing mother. Had she thoroughly thought things through, her life would have turned out better. She would struggle to provide for her brothers and child, but her life would hold a meaning behind it. She would have a reason to revitalize her life, her family. Consequently, Dewey’s selfish manner is significant of societies' way of acting upon their selfish needs and the consequences that follow their decisions.

Thursday, October 20, 2011

Hamlet essay


Scene five initially unfolds with the two gravediggers discussing the burial of Ophelia.  Back in the day, if one committed a suicide, it was the ultimate sin and they were not worthy of a Christian burial in the churchyard. This conversation between the two gravediggers symbolizes how religious people were in the Elizabethan times and how sins were generally not overlooked. Shakespeare is attempting to stress the importance of religion in this scene and how even people that are not as important as others have a say concerning this matter.  He makes it apparent that the gravediggers serve a purpose in Act five due to the great themes they brings forth to the tragedy, specifically, economic irrelevance once one is deceased and existentialism.   
The main gravedigger commences to singing songs while he digs up a variety of skulls of wretched souls. Hamlet is shocked by the gravedigger’s lack of sympathy as he nonchalantly tosses the skulls around as if they are worthless compost.  He contemplates about whom these skulls might have belonged to. By displaying the throwing of the skulls, Shakespeare is making an effort to show that everyone dies, their economic status and place in society is irrelevant. Hamlet perplexedly states, “Why may not that be the skull of a lawyer? Where be his quiddities now . . . ?” (V.i.90–91). Hence, the lawyer and the courtier might have had an impact on someone’s life while they were alive, but once their bodies are buried, life goes on and does not stop for anyone.
Allusions play an important role in this scene; Shakespeare mentions legendary men such as, Adam, Alexander the Great, and Julius Caesar. Hamlet ultimately comes to the realization that all men eventually perish and no one is spared of death’s wrath.  In the beginning acts of the play, Hamlet deliberated committing suicide and in this scene it is evident he is glad he did not do so. By looking at the bodies and how people as insignificant as gravediggers can have an immense amount of supremacy over people that once were much more vital to society, Hamlet is repulsed. For someone who is looked upon so highly while he is living, he now knows that people will react inconsequentially years upon his death.
From a metaphorical perspective, the skulls represent the idea of existentialism. A British novelist once stated, “Existentialism is about being a saint without God; being your own hero, without all the sanction and support of religion or society.” By this she means, make your own legacy while you are living because once you are dead, nothing you have done will truly impact the world. This quote describes the characters of Hamlet, for they all wish to be heroes in the end of the play and keep their reputation flourishing, but once they die no one foresees them as protagonists. Their deaths were simply tragic and will be forgotten about rapidly. No one’s legacy or body lives on eternally.

Monday, October 10, 2011

Literary Terms Part 2

https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0Bx4ZM8vIBfnbMjg4OTNhODMtZjlmMS00MzNjLWJjMTktYzk3YmMyMDcyYWI4&hl=en_US

Grendel Movie Project.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U242E5zOR1I

Monday, October 3, 2011

Literary Terms.

https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0Bx4ZM8vIBfnbODVkMjJlYzMtYTk1MS00MmJiLTkyYjMtM2ExMDk3NzU4NzNl&hl=en_US