Sonnet 130

Klara Sulce

Mr. Perez

English AP

3 November 2011

In Sonnet 130, William Shakespeare utilizes literary devices to develop themes in his poems. He relates the speaker’s lover to a variety of other beauties---none of which work in the mistress's favor. During the Elizabethan era, poets accepted Petrarch’s technique for writing love poems. He makes highly overemphasized comparisons between nature and the poets’ paramour that when literally translated, sound absolutely preposterous. In Sonnet 130 William Shakespeare’s use of understatement parallels the common poets’ use of exaggeration with regards to their perception of women. As a result, the poem is uplifted and brings forth the ideas that women encompass flaws and that beauty should not be defined through comparisons to nature.

            In the first quatrain, Shakespeare states that her eyes are “nothing like the sun,” her lips are less red than coral; compared to white snow, her breasts are dun-colored, and her hairs are like black wires on her head. It is through being brutally honest that he teases the traditional metaphors, and demonstrates a speaker who somewhat bewildered, decides to tell the truth about women and their imperfections. He questions the conventions of love poetry common to his day by intimating that, “Your mistress’ eyes are like the sun?” For the speaker, this idea is bizarre. For “my mistress’ eyes aren’t at all like the sun.”

            In the couplet the speaker goes on to declare that, “by heav’n,” he finds the love he exhibits for his mistress as ultra rare and valuable. The speaker’s full intent is discovered in the last few lines of the sonnet. He demands that love does not require conceits in order to be genuine; and women do not need to look like goddesses in order to be beautiful.